You know what I don't understand? I don't understand why well known anti-gay activist, Randy Thomasson of Save California, recently suggested that a teenage homosexual, who was murdered by a classmate, provoked his own killing. No, I am not making this up. I wish I were, but I am not.
First, some background on the case, fifteen year old, Lawrence "Larry" King was openly gay and also a cross dresser. He was very flamboyant and thought nothing of chasing others boys around the school. He relished the attention that his being out and his appearance brought him. After making his interest in another boy obvious and public, the other boy shot King in the head twice in a computer lab at the school. King died from brain injuries two days later.
Folks, there is a lot going on with this story, both positive and negative. A young man being brave enough to be who he is. Some teachers and students who support King. An assistant principal who may have used King to advance her own agenda. Many, many students who bullied and harassed King. A city where the gay community is almost non-existent. The fact that King was very provocative and sexually suggestive with his male classmates. The behavior of a lot of people involved in this case is questionable.
Young, Gay, and Murdered
That being established, however.................................
Does any of King's behavior justify his being gunned down in cold blood by another middle schooler? Seriously, ladies and gentlemen, think about this. Even if King were parading himself about in front of his killer while telling the young man "You know you want me", does that justify cold blooded murder?
Thomasson certainly seems to think so.
Gay Teen Brought On His Own Murder
The audio clip in the above link is beyond repugnant. The killer was being "harassed", so it is understandable that he would pump a couple of bullets into King's brain. "Bad teachers" supported King to promote the "homosexual agenda". (On a side note, I have been asking for years what the "homosexual agenda" is, but I have yet to receive an answer that wasn't an illogical homophobic rant.) Allowing King to dress in female clothing caused "sexual tension". Allowing students to express themselves through their dress is "social engineering". Anti-bullying statues that include gays are "indoctrination".
This "gentleman" (and I use the term VERY loosely) is reprehensible. His anti-gay bigotry is sickening. His attempt to justify murder is stomach churning.
The killer in this case also had some serious mitigating circumstances in his life. These must be considered in court, but to suggest that King's homosexuality, cross dressing, and behavior legitimize his murder is abominable!
Quite frankly, friends, I would like to see this fanatic be forced to sit and listen to first hand accounts from gays and lesbians about the bigotry and prejudicial treatment that they endure on a day to day, hour to hour, basis. Maybe then, he could remove his cranium from his anus and realize that homophobia is criminal and that gays deserve the same rights, respect, and dignity as everyone else.
Peace and love, my brothers and sisters.
No comments:
Post a Comment